Denmark Warns US: “Shoot First” Policy Reaffirmed for Greenland
In a major escalation of transatlantic tensions on January 9–10, 2026, the Danish government has officially reaffirmed a Cold War-era military directive. Danish troops are now under standing orders to “shoot first and ask questions later” if any foreign power—including the United States—attempts a military annexation of Greenland.
This move comes after US President Donald Trump, fresh from a military operation in Venezuela, repeatedly stated that the US “needs” Greenland for national security and has not ruled out taking it by force.
Also Read | Bihar Pregnant Job Scam Busted: ₹10 Lakh Fraud in Nawada 2026
1. The “Shoot First” Directive: 1952 Standing Order
The directive being cited by the Danish Defence Ministry is a 1952 rule rooted in the trauma of the 1940 Nazi invasion of Denmark.
-
The Rule: Soldiers are mandated to “immediately take up the fight” without waiting for formal orders from commanders or political clearance.5
-
Why it exists: During WWII, communication breakdowns left Danish units paralyzed.6 The 1952 order ensures that the Joint Arctic Command can respond instantly to a breach of sovereignty.
-
Applicability: Danish officials have clarified that this provision applies to any invading force, regardless of whether they are a NATO ally.
2. Military Reality: David vs. Goliath
Despite the bold rhetoric, military analysts emphasize the massive disparity between the two nations.
| Feature | Denmark / Greenland Defense | United States Military |
| Active Personnel | ~17,300 (Total Armed Forces) | ~1.3 Million |
| Greenland Presence | Small Joint Arctic Command units | ~200 personnel at Pituffik Space Base |
| Air Power | 21 F-35s, 26 F-16s | 13,000+ Aircraft (including F-35, F-22) |
| Naval Power | 9 Frigates, 0 Submarines | 11 Supercarriers, 68 Submarines |
| Recent Spending | $13.8 Billion (Newly allocated) | $850+ Billion (Annual Budget) |
Also Read | Bihar Pregnant Job Scam Busted: ₹10 Lakh Fraud in Nawada 2026
3. Strategic Context: Why 2026?
The “Greenland Gambit” has moved from a diplomatic curiosity to a potential security crisis due to several factors:
-
The “Venezuela Precedent”: The recent US operation in Venezuela has made European allies fear that “annexation by force” is now a credible part of the US toolkit.9
-
Resource Security: US officials, including Vice President JD Vance, have emphasized that Greenland’s minerals are vital to reducing dependence on China.
-
Russian/Chinese Presence: Trump has claimed, without public evidence, that the Arctic is “covered with Russian and Chinese ships,” necessitating US “ownership” rather than just a treaty-based lease.
Also Read | Bihar Pregnant Job Scam Busted: ₹10 Lakh Fraud in Nawada 2026
4. Impact on NATO
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has been blunt, stating that a US attack on a NATO ally would be “the end of everything” for the alliance.11
-
Article 5 Paradox: Article 5 (Collective Defense) was designed to protect members from external threats.12 A conflict between the US and Denmark over Greenland would create a legal and political paralysis that could permanently shatter NATO.
-
Diplomatic Efforts: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is scheduled to meet Danish officials next week to attempt to de-escalate the situation and shift the conversation toward a “resource-for-security” arrangement.
Also Read | Bihar Pregnant Job Scam Busted: ₹10 Lakh Fraud in Nawada 2026
