Now the high-profile battle for the Nemom assembly seat has shifted from the streets to the courtroom. On Wednesday, March 25, 2026, the Congress-led UDF and the CPI(M)-led LDF announced plans for coordinated legal action against Kerala BJP State President Rajeev Chandrasekhar. Therefore, the opposition alleges that the NDA candidate intentionally concealed a massive residential property in Bengaluru from his official election affidavit. Currently, while the Election Commission (ECI) has accepted his nomination, the political temperature in Kerala continues to rise just weeks before the April 9 polls.
Also Read | Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi Sentenced to 17 Years in Jail
At a Glance:
-
The Allegation: Concealment of a 49,000 sq. ft. bungalow in Koramangala, Bengaluru.
-
Estimated Value: Opposition claims the land alone is worth approximately Rs 200 crore.
-
Status: ECI Returning Officer has accepted the nomination despite objections.
-
Legal Path: Congress candidate K.S. Sabarinadhan and CPI(M)’s V. Sivankutty both plan to move court.
-
Defense: Chandrasekhar labels the charges “100% false” and part of a “desperate narrative.”
In This Article:
-
The Koramangala Bungalow: Evidence vs. Affidavit
-
“Quasi-Judicial Limits”: Why the Opposition is Moving Court
-
Betrayal of Voters: CPI(M)’s Hardline Stance
-
The Candidate’s Counter: “A Set Pattern of Distraction”
-
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
The Koramangala Bungalow: Evidence vs. Affidavit
Now the controversy centers on a premium piece of real estate in one of India’s most expensive neighborhoods. The Congress party has produced documents alleging that Chandrasekhar failed to disclose a 1.07-acre plot featuring a 49,000 sq. ft. mansion in Bengaluru’s Koramangala 3rd Block. Therefore, they argue that this omission is a direct violation of the Representation of the People Act.
First, the UDF highlighted that the BJP leader listed this very address as his residence during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Next, they pointed to property tax receipts paid as recently as March 17, 2026. Thus, the opposition claims that while Chandrasekhar reported total assets of over Rs 93 crore, he has arguably left out a single asset worth more than double that total.
Also Read | Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi Sentenced to 17 Years in Jail
“Quasi-Judicial Limits”: Why the Opposition is Moving Court
Now the acceptance of the nomination by the ECI has not settled the matter. Because the Returning Officer (RO) only has limited powers to reject a nomination based on technicalities, the Congress plans to take the fight higher. Therefore, the battle is now heading to the judiciary.
First, Congress candidate K.S. Sabarinadhan explained that the RO is a quasi-judicial authority and lacks the jurisdiction to rule on deep asset discrepancies. Next, he stated that the party will pursue “appropriate legal means” to seek disqualification. Thus, the strategy is to prove in court that the affidavit is legally fraudulent, which could potentially lead to a disqualification post-election or an annulment of the candidacy.
Betrayal of Voters: CPI(M)’s Hardline Stance
Now the Left Democratic Front (LDF) has also entered the legal fray. Sitting Minister and LDF candidate V. Sivankutty has labeled the non-disclosure a “serious betrayal” of the democratic process. Therefore, the CPI(M) is launching its own parallel legal investigation.
First, Sivankutty noted that public representatives are obligated to be fully transparent about their financial holdings. Next, he alleged that the “large-scale discrepancies” represent a challenge to basic democratic principles. Thus, even if the RO did not reject the papers on technical grounds, the LDF intends to keep the pressure on by highlighting the “hidden assets” during the campaign.
Also Read | Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi Sentenced to 17 Years in Jail
The Candidate’s Counter: “A Set Pattern of Distraction”
Now the Kerala BJP chief has come out swinging against his rivals. Rajeev Chandrasekhar has dismissed the entire controversy as a recycled narrative from the 2024 elections. Therefore, he challenged the opposition to finally follow through on their threats of court action.
First, he clarified that the house in Bengaluru is owned by a partnership firm in which he is a partner, a detail he claims has been properly disclosed. Next, he accused the Congress of “unleashing a new narrative” whenever they realize an election is slipping away. Thus, he insists that voters are focused on his development agenda rather than what he calls “wild and unsubstantiated allegations.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What exactly is Rajeev Chandrasekhar accused of?
He is accused of failing to disclose a 49,000 sq. ft. bungalow in Bengaluru worth an estimated Rs 200 crore in his 2026 election affidavit.
Has the Election Commission rejected his nomination?
No. The Returning Officer accepted the nomination on March 24, 2026, stating it did not violate the grounds for rejection listed in the Candidate’s Handbook.
Who are the main candidates in the Nemom constituency?
The contest is a three-way battle between Rajeev Chandrasekhar (BJP), V. Sivankutty (CPI-M), and K.S. Sabarinadhan (Congress).
When are the Kerala Assembly elections being held?
Polling is scheduled for April 9, 2026, with the counting of votes set for May 4.
Why does the opposition say they are moving to court now?
They believe the Returning Officer does not have the legal power to decide on complex asset non-disclosure, making a court petition necessary to seek disqualification.
Also Read | Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi Sentenced to 17 Years in Jail
End….
